





seriously now, if you think i'm an expert in musical legends, all bow to wikipedia!







and last but not least, the business shoe worthy pacheco.

























i love fashion, that's the reason why i set up this blog. fashion celebrates individualism and i pride myself for not coming out from the same cookie cutter. but because i am not from print journalism and i operate an online independent operation, i am classed as a blogger. can i be a freelance online writer instead i wonder?
and those who jet set and loan clothes (or gets gifted) to attend shows, those who gets recognised and mobbed on the streets and who happen to have a blog, are not bloggers. they are mini celebrities now, who happen to have a blog.
and then there are online only webzines, whom we know nothing about the authors but they feature a selection of what's cool and hip, sometimes a repost of press releases. they are classed as bloggers too. so the term "bloggers" really do cut pretty widely.
several fashion houses have gradually warmed up to the idea of "bloggers". i'm not exactly complaining, i get invited to shows which i never dream of being able to do so a year ago. it's new territory and we all tread carefully, bloggers and fashion houses alike. it's almost like free publicity if i come back and blog about an event that i've been to. but the downside is that the fashion houses have little control over what is the end product on the blogs. the wrong association could be damaging.

of course i find it exciting to be at the shows. but i want to be a respected member of press, not a fan. to get recognition or control the onus of censorship lies within the blogger itself. "should i really post that unflattering picture of that designer/celebrity, yea i'll do it anyway as people will know i'm there and i met so & so!". magazines go through several stages of close examination before it gets published, so any double chins or unflattering pics get airbrushed or removed. the onus of self examination lies with the blogger.
bloggers get a lot of bad press because of the inaccuracy of information on their blogs. phillip lim is often misspelled as philip lim. can you blame him if a request for an invite to his show gets rejected? i raise my hand, i am guilty of that, i recently incorrectly spelled the name of a designer whom i had a giveaway organised recently.
christopher shannon spring summer 2010
at a recent show in milan, a few "bloggers" were sat front row and were given laptops to blog and tweet instantaneously. i witnessed first hand, a few bloggers were on their phones texting non-stop, presumably tweeting. what the fuck?! are we not supposed to enjoy the show, take in the moment and absorb it all? what's with the obsession in letting the world know which is the opening look, and while tweeting we ignored the 2nd and 3rd look? what's with the idea of letting people know we are at the shows/party just because?
seating arrangements within the show gets even more political. at a recent show i saw a blogger sat front row, while editors from a well respected magazine gets bumped to 3rd. and there i was throwing an imaginary hissy fit that i was allocated a standing ticket! ok i did get front row seats for a few shows i went to this year, i am thankful for that. but there's also no reason why the mag editors have to be bumped.

topman design spring summer 2010
credibility is difficult to earn, and i'm not on a crusade to change the opinions of everyone. i'm guilty of some of the things i mentioned anyway. blogging is cited as the next big thing, and like all bubbles it will burst. i am truly thankful for the things i've been able to achieve with this blog but i don't want to be called a blogger because of the sweeping generalisation, but that's like spitting in my soup.
fashion should be fun so we also shouldn't take everything too seriously. ok i'm kinda lost now, but there seemingly is a problem, and i'm raising it.















guy in london pondering about all the inane, frivolous and unnecessary wants in life. like, "00o00h i want one of those".
